The influence of overhanging restoration margins on interproximal alveolar bone levels in general dental practice.
Millar B, Blake K.
Br Dent J. 2019 Aug;227(3):223-227. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0530-1.
The prevalence of overhanging dental restorations and their relationship to periodontal disease.
Brunsvold MA, Lane JJ.
J Clin Periodontol. 1990 Feb;17(2):67-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb01064.x.
Radiographic Evaluation of Marginal Bone Height and Density Around Overhanging Dental Restorations.
Dindar MB, Açıkgöz-Alparslan E, Tekbaş-Atay M.
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022 May-Jun;42(3):401-408. doi: 10.11607/prd.5424.
The Relationships Between Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses and Restorations and the Periodontium.
Ercoli C, Tarnow D, Poggio CE, Tsigarida A, Ferrari M, Caton JG, Chochlidakis K.
J Prosthodont. 2021 Apr;30(4):305-317. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13292. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
Radiological assessment of alveolar bone loss associated with overhanging restorations: A retrospective cone beam computed tomography study.
Tarcin B, Gumru B, Idman E.
J Dent Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.06.021. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
Automatic deep learning detection of overhanging restorations in bitewing radiographs.
Magat G, Altındag A, Pertek Hatipoglu F, Hatipoglu O, Bayrakdar İS, Celik O, Orhan K.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2024 Oct 1;53(7):468-477. doi: 10.1093/dmfr/twae036.
Mechanical benefits of conservative restoration for dental fissure caries.
Zhang Z, Zheng K, Li E, Li W, Li Q, Swain MV.
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Jan;53:11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.010. Epub 2015 Aug 12.
Effect of gingival health of removing overhanging margins of interproximal subgingival amalgam restorations.
Rodriguez-Ferrer HJ, Strahan JD, Newman HN.
J Clin Periodontol. 1980 Dec;7(6):457-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1980.tb02152.x.
The prevalence of overhanging margins in posterior amalgam restorations and periodontal consequences.
Pack AR, Coxhead LJ, McDonald BW.
J Clin Periodontol. 1990 Mar;17(3):145-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1990.tb01078.x.
Comparison of proximal contact and contours of class II restoration in premolars and molars restored with three different matrix systems using FDI criteria: An in vivo study.
Sankhyan V, Makkar S, Negi S, Gupta S, Jain A, Arora G.
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Sep;27(9):913-919. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_313_23. Epub 2024 Sep 7.
