Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
Hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy versus sacrospinous hysteropexy-a multicentre randomised controlled trial (LAVA trial).
van IJsselmuiden MN, van Oudheusden A, Veen J, van de Pol G, Vollebregt A, Radder CM, Housmans S, van Kuijk S, Deprest J, Bongers MY, van Eijndhoven H.
BJOG. 2020 Sep;127(10):1284-1293. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16242. Epub 2020 May 10.
Prospective analysis of transvaginal mesh hysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
Khandwala S, Cruff J.
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Aug;32(8):2241-2247. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04590-0. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
Laparoscopic suture sacrohysteropexy: A meshless uterine- sparing technique for surgical management of uterine prolapse.
Thanatsis N, Ben Zvi M, Kupelian AS, Vashisht A.
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2023 Jun;15(2):171-173. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.15.2.075.
Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.
Husby KR, Larsen MD, Lose G, Klarskov N.
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Nov;30(11):1887-1893. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03950-9. Epub 2019 May 3.
Expression of Heparanase in uterosacral ligaments of women with or without uterine prolapse.
Ben-Zvi M, Herman HG, Schreiber L, Sagiv R, Bar J, Condrea A, Ginath S.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2020 Jan;244:110-113. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.024. Epub 2019 Nov 21.
Treatment of uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: a randomized multicenter trial comparing sacrospinous fixation with vaginal hysterectomy (SAVE U trial).
Detollenaere RJ, den Boon J, Stekelenburg J, Alhafidh AH, Hakvoort RA, Vierhout ME, van Eijndhoven HW.
BMC Womens Health. 2011 Feb 15;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6874-11-4.
Risk factors for coexistence of cervical elongation in uterine prolapse.
Hsiao SM, Chang TC, Chen CH, Li YI, Shun CT, Lin HH.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2018 Oct;229:94-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
Systematic classification of uterine cervical elongation in patients with pelvic organ prolapse.
Mothes AR, Mothes H, Fröber R, Radosa MP, Runnebaum IB.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 May;200:40-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.02.029. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
A randomized, prospective, controlled study comparing uterine preserving laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh versus laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy in the treatment of uterine prolapse.
Doğan O, Yassa M, Eren E, Birol İlter P, Tuğ N.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2024 Jun;297:120-125. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.03.042. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
