Cone biopsy of the cervix.
[No authors listed]
Lancet. 1981 Aug 22;2(8243):400-2.
Fractal geometry applied to the analysis of cervix biopsy.
Rodríguez-Velásquez JO, Barrios-Arroyave FA, Correa-Herrera SC, Grisales-Gutiérrez CE, Prieto-Bohórquez SE, Jattin-Balcázar JJ, Ruiz-Morales JJ.
Diagn Cytopathol. 2021 Aug;49(8):938-943. doi: 10.1002/dc.24762. Epub 2021 May 6.
A Colposcopy Trainer to Simulate Visualization and Biopsy of the Cervix.
Felix HM, Lannen A.
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Dec;132(6):1430-1435. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002953.
Histopathological correlation of cervical biopsy and tissue after excision in patients with precancerous lesions of the cervix.
Mandić A, Stevanović N, Gutic B, Maričić S, Nikin Z, Šolajić N.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;304(1):223-230. doi: 10.1007/s00404-020-05911-w. Epub 2021 Jan 2.
Cone biopsy of the cervix.
Tovell HM.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1976 Mar;19(1):2-15. doi: 10.1097/00003081-197603000-00001.
Discordance between cytology and biopsy histology of the cervix: what to consider and what to do.
Anschau F, Guimarães Gonçalves MA.
Acta Cytol. 2011;55(2):158-62. doi: 10.1159/000320911. Epub 2011 Feb 15.
Interpretability of excisional biopsies of the cervix: cone biopsy and loop excision.
Miroshnichenko GG, Parva M, Holtz DO, Klemens JA, Dunton CJ.
J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2009 Jan;13(1):10-2. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31817ff940.
Controlled fine needle biopsy of the uterine cervix during pregnancy.
Keeler SM, Rust OA, Kiefer DG, Prutsman WJ, Proudfit CL, Naftolin F.
Reprod Sci. 2011 Aug;18(8):737-42. doi: 10.1177/1933719110396721. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
The outcome of pregnancy after cone biopsy of the cervix: a case-control study.
Jones JM, Sweetnam P, Hibbard BM.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1979 Dec;86(12):913-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1979.tb11237.x.
[Biopsy of the cervix uteri].
Curiel Valdés J.
Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2008 Jan;76(1):65-6.
