Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
Effect of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension on treatment failure in women with uterovaginal prolapse: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial.
Nager CW, Visco AG, Richter HE, Rardin CR, Komesu Y, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Paraiso MFR, Mazloomdoost D, Sridhar A, Thomas S; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Aug;225(2):153.e1-153.e31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
Bilateral Sacrospinous Hysteropexy Versus Bilateral Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation with Vaginal Hysterectomy for Apical Uterovaginal Prolapse.
Wang K, Shi L, Huang Z, Xu Y.
Int Neurourol J. 2022 Sep;26(3):239-247. doi: 10.5213/inj.2244076.038. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
Native tissue sacrospinous hysteropexy from an anterior approach.
Plair A, Matthews C.
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jun;32(6):1591-1593. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04601-0. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
Characteristics associated with composite surgical failure over 5 years of women in a randomized trial of sacrospinous hysteropexy with graft vs vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Richter HE, Sridhar A, Nager CW, Komesu YM, Harvie HS, Zyczynski HM, Rardin C, Visco A, Mazloomdoost D, Thomas S; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Jan;228(1):63.e1-63.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.07.048. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
Sacrospinous hysteropexy - an alternative in primary surgical treatment of apical compartment prolapse.
Homola Prokop, Hensel Germund, Košťál Milan.
Ceska Gynekol. 2021;86(3):200-204. doi: 10.48095/cccg2021200.
Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse recurrence after sacrospinous hysteropexy or vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension.
Schulten SF, Detollenaere RJ, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, Van Eijndhoven HW.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):252.e1-252.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.017. Epub 2022 Apr 16.
Sacrospinous ligament fixation for hysteropexy: does concomitant anterior and posterior fixation improve surgical outcome?
Lo TS, Uy-Patrimonio MC, Hsieh WC, Yang JC, Huang SY, Chua S.
Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Jun;29(6):811-819. doi: 10.1007/s00192-017-3487-0. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
Postoperative pain and the need for intervention after sacrospinous ligament hysteropexy compared to colpopexy: a retrospective cohort study.
Yuan AS, Propst KA, Ferrando CA.
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Sep;33(9):2525-2531. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05301-7. Epub 2022 Jul 26.
Hysteropexy. A review.
Ridgeway B, Frick AC, Walter MD.
Minerva Ginecol. 2008 Dec;60(6):509-28.
