Reproductive and obstetrical outcomes after treatment of retained products of conception: hysteroscopic removal vs ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration, a prospective follow-up study.
Wagenaar LP, van Vugt WLJ, Huppelschoten AG, Radder CM, Peters LW, Weyers S, van Wessel S, Schoot BC, Hamerlynck TWO, van Vliet HA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):233.e1-233.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.03.017. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
PMID:38521232
Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wagenaar LP, Hamerlynck TW, Radder CM, Peters LW, Weyers S, Schoot BC, van Vliet HA.
Fertil Steril. 2023 Dec;120(6):1243-1251. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.08.956. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
PMID:37657600
Additional considerations for hysteroscopic morcellation versus electric vacuum aspiration.
Ayyar A, Lindheim SR, Flyckt R.
Fertil Steril. 2024 Jun;121(6):1080. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.02.009. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
PMID:38346550
Intrauterine adhesion in ultrasound-guided manual vacuum aspiration (USG-MVA) versus electric vacuum aspiration (EVA): a randomised controlled trial.
Chung JPW, Law TSM, Ng K, Ip PNP, Li TC.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06328-y.
PMID:38355420
Operative hysteroscopy versus ultrasound-guided electric vacuum aspiration for removal of retained products of conception: A prospective cohort study.
Wagenaar LP, van Vliet HA, Radder CM, Peters LW, Weyers S, Schoot BC, Hamerlynck TW.