Clin Perinatol. 2021 Dec;48(4):745-759. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2021.07.005. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
PMID:34774207
Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Zhu X, Li F, Shi Y, Feng Z, De Luca D; Nasal Oscillation Post-Extubation (NASONE) Study Group.
Comparative effectiveness of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation vs continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with RDS: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zeng J, Tan R, Cao H.
Eur J Pediatr. 2025 Jun 28;184(7):455. doi: 10.1007/s00431-025-06282-7.
PMID:40579569
Nasal Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation Versus Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Before and After Invasive Ventilatory Support.
Ekhaguere O, Patel S, Kirpalani H.
Clin Perinatol. 2019 Sep;46(3):517-536. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2019.05.004. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
PMID:31345544
Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation versus Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and Apnea of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sabsabi B, Harrison A, Banfield L, Mukerji A.
Am J Perinatol. 2022 Sep;39(12):1314-1320. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722337. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
PMID:33450781
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure versus Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation in Preterm Neonates: What if Mean Airway Pressures Were Equivalent?
Mukerji A, Keszler M.
Am J Perinatol. 2024 Sep;41(12):1616-1624. doi: 10.1055/a-2242-7391. Epub 2024 Jan 11.