Expandable cage technology in minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion: where are we and what does the future hold?
Ikwuegbuenyi CA, Willett N, Wang E, Inzerillo S, Hussain I.
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2025 Apr;22(4):349-360. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2025.2477610. Epub 2025 Mar 12.
PMID:40053344
Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Duan Y, Feng D, Li T, Wang Y, Jiang L, Huang Y.
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:144-156. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.111. Epub 2023 Dec 23.
PMID:38145654
A comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) cage material on fusion rates: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Pairojboriboon S, Niruthisard S, Chandhanayingyong C, Monsereenusorn C, Poopan S, Lo SL.
World Neurosurg X. 2024 May 25;23:100392. doi: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100392. eCollection 2024 Jul.
PMID:38884030
Interbody cage devices.
Zdeblick TA, Phillips FM.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Aug 1;28(15 Suppl):S2-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000076841.93570.78.
PMID:12897467
Clinical and radiological outcomes of titanium cage versus polyetheretherketone cage in lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wang H, Zhang H, Xiao C, Zhang K, Qi L.
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Mar 12;48(1):295. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03453-w.
PMID:40075000
Risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion surgery: Series of cases and literature review.
Pan FM, Wang SJ, Yong ZY, Liu XM, Huang YF, Wu DS.
Comparison of the Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Between Expandable Cage and Static Cage for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Su YH, Wu PK, Wu MH, Wong KW, Li WW, Chou SH.
World Neurosurg. 2023 Nov;179:133-142. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.08.035. Epub 2023 Aug 12.