Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.
Hwang JH, Kim BW.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1509-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07366-1. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
PMID:31953731
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Kucukmetin A, Biliatis I, Naik R, Bryant A.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 1;2013(10):CD006651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006651.pub3.
PMID:24085528
Meta-analysis reveals higher intraoperative urologic complication rates in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy.
Hwang JH, Kim B.
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7331-7340. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001980.
PMID:39051908
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.
Wenzel HHB, Smolders RGV, Beltman JJ, Lambrechts S, Trum HW, Yigit R, Zusterzeel PLM, Zweemer RP, Mom CH, Bekkers RLM, Lemmens VEPP, Nijman HW, Van der Aa MA.
A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.
Sun S, Cai J, Li R, Wang Y, Zhao J, Huang Y, Xu L, Yang Q, Wang Z.