Radical abdominal hysterectomy.
Abu-Rustum NR, Hoskins WJ.
Surg Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;81(4):815-28. doi: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70167-5.
SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, Arévalo-Serrano J, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Aliyev S, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujić G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vázquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Chacon E, Alcazar JL; SUCCOR study Group.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1269-1277. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy.
Capalbo G, Di Donato V, Giannini A, Bogani G.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 1;46(2):85. doi: 10.1097/COC.0000000000000973. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
LACC Trial: Final Analysis on Overall Survival Comparing Open Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT, Robledo KP, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Ribeiro R, Lopez A, Yan X, Isla D, Moretti R, Bernardini MQ, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Coleman RL, Obermair A.
J Clin Oncol. 2024 Aug 10;42(23):2741-2746. doi: 10.1200/JCO.23.02335. Epub 2024 May 29.
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.
Hwang JH, Kim BW.
Surg Endosc. 2020 Apr;34(4):1509-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07366-1. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy for the treatment of early cervical cancer.
Kucukmetin A, Biliatis I, Naik R, Bryant A.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Oct 1;2013(10):CD006651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006651.pub3.
A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.
Sun S, Cai J, Li R, Wang Y, Zhao J, Huang Y, Xu L, Yang Q, Wang Z.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Sep;306(3):623-637. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06348-5. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
Survival of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after abdominal or laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a nationwide cohort study and literature review.
Wenzel HHB, Smolders RGV, Beltman JJ, Lambrechts S, Trum HW, Yigit R, Zusterzeel PLM, Zweemer RP, Mom CH, Bekkers RLM, Lemmens VEPP, Nijman HW, Van der Aa MA.
Eur J Cancer. 2020 Jul;133:14-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.006. Epub 2020 May 15.
Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
Li Z, Chen C, Liu P, Lu A, Zhao H, Zhan X, Duan H, Li P, Zhao W, Yao J, Li D, Jiang H, Liu M, Bin X, Lang J.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Feb;305(2):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06185-6. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
Meta-analysis reveals higher intraoperative urologic complication rates in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy compared to abdominal radical hysterectomy.
Hwang JH, Kim B.
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7331-7340. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001980.
