Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation.
Lemyre B, Deguise MO, Benson P, Kirpalani H, De Paoli AG, Davis PG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 27;7(7):CD003212. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub4.
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.
Lemyre B, Deguise MO, Benson P, Kirpalani H, Ekhaguere OA, Davis PG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 19;7(7):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub3.
Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation vs Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation as Postextubation Support for Preterm Neonates in China: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Zhu X, Qi H, Feng Z, Shi Y, De Luca D; Nasal Oscillation Post-Extubation (NASONE) Study Group.
JAMA Pediatr. 2022 Jun 1;176(6):551-559. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2022.0710.
High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study).
Milési C, Essouri S, Pouyau R, Liet JM, Afanetti M, Portefaix A, Baleine J, Durand S, Combes C, Douillard A, Cambonie G; Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d’Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP).
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Feb;43(2):209-216. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4617-8. Epub 2017 Jan 26.
Effectiveness of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Nasal Intermittent Positive Pressure Ventilation vs Noninvasive High-Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation as Support After Extubation of Neonates Born Extremely Preterm or With More Severe Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
Zhu X, Li F, Shi Y, Feng Z, De Luca D; Nasal Oscillation Post-Extubation (NASONE) Study Group.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2321644. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.21644.
Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ECLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.
Kidman AM, Manley BJ, Boland RA, Malhotra A, Donath SM, Beker F, Davis PG, Bhatia R.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2023 Dec;7(12):844-851. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(23)00235-3. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure vs Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula on Feeding Intolerance in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome: The ENTARES Randomized Clinical Trial.
Cresi F, Maggiora E, Lista G, Dani C, Borgione SM, Spada E, Ferroglio M, Bertino E, Coscia A; ENTARES Study Group.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2323052. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23052.
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Today.
Dani C.
Clin Perinatol. 2021 Dec;48(4):711-724. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
Nasal continuous positive airway pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants.
Ho JJ, Kidman AM, Chua B, Chang G, Fiander M, Davis PG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 11;10(10):CD000143. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000143.pub2.
Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants.
Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, Davis PG.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 15;12(12):CD005384. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub2.
