Effect of the prism and Maddox rod test as the surgical target for type III acute acquired comitant esotropia.
Wang H, Zheng W.
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Apr 15;11:1389201. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1389201. eCollection 2024.
Test-retest variability of cyclodeviations measured using the double Maddox rod test.
Liebermann L, Leske DA, Hatt SR, Holmes JM.
J AAPOS. 2018 Apr;22(2):146-148.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2017.09.010. Epub 2018 Jan 6.
Prism and Maddox rod test as a reliable tool for surgical targeting in small-angle AACE.
Huang L, Wu J, Wang H, Zhang J, Lin H, Cui X, Wei W, Zhong H, Zheng W.
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 14;15(1):8872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93791-y.
The Maddox Rod Screen Test.
Dolman P.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1919;17:235-49.
Size of line in the Maddox-rod test.
SCOBEE RG, GREEN EL.
Am J Ophthalmol. 1948 Jun;31(6):697-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(48)91914-x.
Augmented-dose surgery based on the single Maddox rod test for acute acquired comitant esotropia.
Zheng J, Wang Y, Shen T, Ma B, Yuan Y, Yu X, Chen J.
J AAPOS. 2024 Dec;28(6):104037. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2024.104037. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
Comparison of Methods for Measuring Cyclodeviation.
Liebermann L, Hatt SR, Leske DA, Klaehn LD, Kramer AM, Holmes JM.
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;224:332-342. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.11.005. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
Color dissociation artifacts in double Maddox rod cyclodeviation testing.
Simons K, Arnoldi K, Brown MH.
Ophthalmology. 1994 Dec;101(12):1897-901. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(94)31086-4.
Accuracy of double Maddox rod with induced hypertropia in normal subjects.
Marsh JD, Durkin MW, Hack AE, Markowitz BB, Cheeseman EW.
Am Orthopt J. 2014;64:76-80. doi: 10.3368/aoj.64.1.76.
The Maddox rod test: a ten-year follow-up.
SNYDACKER D.
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1962;60:293-303.
