Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a comprehensive, systematic literature review.
Campagna G, Panico G, Lombisani A, Vacca L, Caramazza D, Scambia G, Ercoli A.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Oct;277:57-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.08.006. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and durability.
Ronsini C, Pasanisi F, Cianci S, Vastarella MG, Pennacchio M, Torella M, Ercoli A, Colacurci N.
Front Surg. 2023 Jun 7;10:1180060. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1180060. eCollection 2023.
Effect of Uterosacral Ligament Suspension vs Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation With or Without Perioperative Behavioral Therapy for Pelvic Organ Vaginal Prolapse on Surgical Outcomes and Prolapse Symptoms at 5 Years in the OPTIMAL Randomized Clinical Trial.
Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Brubaker L, Norton P, Gantz M, Richter HE, Weidner A, Menefee S, Schaffer J, Pugh N, Meikle S; NICHD Pelvic Floor Disorders Network.
JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1554-1565. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.2827.
Sacrospinous hysteropexy versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension in women with uterine prolapse stage 2 or higher: observational follow-up of a multicentre randomised trial.
Schulten SFM, Detollenaere RJ, Stekelenburg J, IntHout J, Kluivers KB, van Eijndhoven HWF.
BMJ. 2019 Sep 10;366:l5149. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5149.
Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation vs Uterosacral Ligaments Suspension for Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Chen Y, Peng L, Zhang J, Shen H, Luo D.
Urology. 2022 Aug;166:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.04.012. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
The effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic uterosacral ligament suspension: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vermeulen CKM, Schuurman B, Coolen AWM, Meijs-Hermanns PR, van Leijsen SAL, Veen J, Bongers MY.
BJOG. 2023 Dec;130(13):1568-1578. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17565. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
Laparoscopic Versus Vaginal Uterosacral Ligament Suspension in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Literature.
Douligeris A, Kathopoulis N, Zachariou E, Mortaki A, Zacharakis D, Kypriotis K, Chatzipapas I, Protopapas A.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2024 Jun;31(6):477-487. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.03.007. Epub 2024 Mar 16.
Development of a Uterosacral Ligament Suspension Rat Model.
Miller BJ, Jones BK, Turner JS, Caliari SR, Vaughan MH.
J Vis Exp. 2022 Aug 17;(186). doi: 10.3791/64311.
Is absorbable suture superior to permanent suture for uterosacral ligament suspension?
Peng L, Liu YH, He SX, Di XP, Shen H, Luo DY.
Neurourol Urodyn. 2020 Sep;39(7):1958-1965. doi: 10.1002/nau.24434. Epub 2020 Jul 13.
Uterosacral and sacrospinous ligament suspension for restoration of apical vaginal support.
Morgan DM, Larson K.
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;53(1):72-85. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181cf2d51.
