A Comparison of Occlusal Schemes with Condylar Inclination and Anterior Guidance in Dentate Individuals.
Parakh MK, Prasad D K, Hegde C.
Int J Prosthodont. 2024 Sep 27;37(5):505-511. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8516.
PMID:37824122
Evaluation of Sagittal Inclination of Occlusal Plane and Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Various Anterior Reference Points on Arcon and Nonarcon Articulators.
Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
Kumar CD, Selvaraj S, Mohan J, Raju R.
Ann Afr Med. 2023 Jul-Sep;22(3):316-320. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_70_22.
PMID:37417019
Effect of altered canine guidance on condylar movement during laterotrusion.
Ogawa M, Ogawa T, Koyano K, Suetsugu T.
Int J Prosthodont. 1998 Mar-Apr;11(2):139-44.
PMID:9709603
A clinical comparison of sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle derived from a conventional electronic tracking device and an optical jaw tracking device.
Nigam AA, Lee JD, Lee SJ.
J Prosthet Dent. 2023 Nov 28:S0022-3913(23)00718-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.10.034. Online ahead of print.
PMID:38030543
Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
Das A, Muddugangadhar BC, Mawani DP, Mukhopadhyay A.
Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An in vivo study.
Keerthana SR, Mohammed HS, Hariprasad A, Anand M, Ayesha S.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Oct-Dec;21(4):397-404. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_239_21.
PMID:34810368
Effect of a novel rotation coordinating device on registered horizontal condylar guidance of nonarcon semi-adjustable articulators.
Manshaee F, Najatidanesh F, Savabi O, Atash R.
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Sep 27;20:101. eCollection 2023.